RECENT NEWS

June 10, 2024
Couples who bring significant assets or debts to the marriage or where one or both is earning a substantial income should consider having a prenuptial agreement. Also, where one or both parties expect to inherit significant assets or receive gifts from third parties, a prenuptial should be part of the pre-wedding process. Additionally, couples who marry later in life or who are entering a second or third marriage may bring assets, debts, incomes and children to the new relationship. Protecting their hard earned nonmarital assets and future income is necessary so the individual and their children and grandchildren’s inheritance are protected through a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreements require transparency. Both parties must provide the other with full financial disclosure, and there must be enough time before the wedding to allow the parties to discuss and negotiate the issues. Discussions often even include how the household bills will be paid, what happens to the home when one spouse dies, and the like. A prenuptial agreement also typically addresses whether alimony will be waived or how the payment of alimony is defined in the event of a separation or divorce. A prenuptial agreement can also address situations where one party brings significant debts to the marriage that the other spouse helps pay off during the marriage so the spouse who helps pay off the other’s debts is credited for their contributions upon a divorce or death. What issues are resolved by a Pre-Nuptial Agreement that would help determine whether I might need such an agreement or not? A prenuptial agreement may define which assets remain non-marital despite potential claims of equitable interest by a spouse; whether the parties will waive the receipt of alimony even if at the time of the divorce one party most likely would pay alimony to the other; how assets will be divided upon a parties’ death; whether fault will affect the division of assets and debts; whether parties will be responsible for their own legal fees and costs upon a divorce, and many other issues. The two big issues that prenuptial agreements in South Carolina cannot determine are the custody of children and the amount of child support. Can parties use the same attorney to draft and advise both parties regarding their prenuptial agreement? No . It is unethical for the same attorney to represent both parties regarding a prenuptial agreement. However, as a practical matter, one party’s attorney usually drafts the document, and the other party hires separate legal counsel to review and negotiate any necessary changes. Both attorneys also typically assist the parties in preparing the required disclosure of finances. It is vital that both parties receive independent legal advice in drafting and executing their prenuptial agreement as it alters the normal operation of law and valuable rights are usually waived. It also helps ensure that the agreement will later be found enforceable by the courts. Under what circumstances will a court not enforce a prenuptial agreement? A court may refuse to enforce a prenuptial agreement when the parties have (1) used the same attorney to advise them during the drafting and execution of the agreement; (2) if the parties did not freely, fairly, reasonably or in good faith enter into the prenuptial agreement; (3) if the parties did not give each other full and fair financial disclosure before they entered their agreement; (4) if the agreement was obtained through fraud, duress, mistake or through misrepresentation, overreaching or nondisclosure of material facts; (5) if the was agreement unconscionable meaning that it was so unfair no reasonable person should have agreed to the terms; or (6) if have the facts and circumstances changed so dramatically since the execution of the agreement that it is unfair and unreasonable to enforce it. Some of these factors depend greatly upon the specific circumstances of each case. In 2003, our state Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s denial of alimony to a spouse with diabetes and sponge kidneys who entered into a prenuptial agreement “freely and knowledgeably, with adequate disclosure, and without undue influence or overreaching.” The court was likely persuaded by the fact that wife suffered from those health conditions at the time of the marriage, she had legal counsel when she signed the document, she was advised not to sign the document and her husband provided her with full financial disclosure. In fact, as that case, Hardee v. Hardee , notes, “'[t]he current trend and majority rule allows parties to prospectively contract to limit or eliminate spousal support.'..." Hardee also provides a synopsis of courts’ attitudes toward prenuptial agreements, stating, “In the past two decades ... the courts have reconsidered... public policy in light of societal changes, and today, premarital agreements, so long as they do not promote divorce or otherwise offend public policy, are generally favored as conducive to the welfare of the parties and the marriage relationship as they tend to prevent strife, secure peace, and adjust, settle, and generally dispose of rights in property.” Is it ok to sign a PreNuptial Agreement the day before the wedding? While there is no specific law about how far ahead of a wedding a prenuptial agreement must be signed in order to be “valid,” it is safe to say that two weeks before a wedding is cutting it quite close. The closer to the wedding date, the stronger the argument that one party may later claim they were forced to sign under duress. Entering into a prenuptial agreement is requires competent, experienced legal counsel. Both parties also need time to work through the process thoughtfully and honestly. Do not hire an attorney who pulls forms from a friend or downloads the form from the internet as each case is different, and each couple has their own unique needs. When advised by wise, experienced counsel, especially when significant resources are involved, discuss your circumstances and consider hiring the attorney who is competent to draft a document that protects your needs and is fair to your fiancé.  Melissa Fuller Brown, Esquire, is the President of the South Carolina Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, a Board Certified SC Family Law Trial Attorney (Certified by the NBTA), Board Certified SC Family Law Mediator & Advanced Mediator (Certified by AAML), AV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell and chosen as a SC Family Law Super Lawyer. She now works primarily as a family law consultant and mediator in Mount Pleasant, SC.
July 12, 2022
In June 2022, The Board of Directors of the American Bar Foundation (ABF) invited Melissa Fuller Brown to become a Fellow in their organization. Fellows of the ABF comprise a global honorary society of lawyers, judges, law faculty, and legal scholars. Membership is by invitation only based upon recommendations of their peers in reliance upon legal careers that demonstrated outstanding dedication to the highest principles of the legal profession and to the welfare of our society. Membership is limited to only one percent (1%) of licensed U.S. lawyers and a limited number of international lawyers.
October 8, 2021
As of October 15, 2021, Melissa Fuller Brown’s law practice is transitioning to a mediation only practice. From this date forward, she will accept family law mediation matters. Please email her at melissa@melissa-brown.com to schedule a mediation.

ATTORNEY MELISSA F. BROWN

Attorney Melissa F. Brown

BLOG SIGN UP

Blog Sign Up

VIDEO CENTER

Watch Melissa F. Brown’s September 23, 2013 with Live 5 News

Watch Melissa F. Brown’s September 23, 2013 with Live 5 News

CENTER 4 Women: Separation & Divorce

MARTINDALE-HUBBELL AV RATING

Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent
Martindale-Hubbell AV Distinguished

SUPER LAWYERS RATING

Melissa F. Brown
The South Carolina Supreme Court’s Changes to Civil Procedure Rules Directly Impact Family Court Litigants
April 16, 2014

Today’s (April 16, 2014) Shearouse Advance Sheets No. 15, the South Carolina Supreme Court amended portions of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure that directly impact family court cases.  The Court ordered that Rules 11 and 77,  SCRCP , are amended and 41.2,  SCRCP  is added as follows:

Amendment to Rule 11(a),  SCRCP : “…The written or  electronic signature  of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate by him that he has read the pleading, motion or other paper…” (emphasis added).

Amendment to Rule 77(d),  SCRCP  :   “…For parties proceeding in the SCE-File electronic filing system, the clerk shall serve notice of the entry by electronically transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to all parties. Such mailing or electronic transmission shall not be necessary to parties who have already received notice. Such mailing or electronic transmission is sufficient notice for all purposes for which notice of the entry of an order or judgment is required by these rules…”

The notes to this Amendment, state: “This amendment requires the clerk to serve notice of entry of an order or judgment through the SCE-File electronic filing system for all parties who are proceeding in the electronic filing system. Any party or the attorney for a party who is a traditional filer and not proceeding in the electronic filing system must be served by first class mail as provided in paragraph (d).”

This Rule does not exclude the electronic filing of Family Court cases. This means that family court litigants should expect that their case information will be online and their privacy is limited but specifically addressed in the Court’s new Rule 41.2,  SCRCP , because it only addresses some of the concerns parties will have about their private information not being protection in the public sphere.

For example, the new Rule (discussed further below) does not hide the listing of parties’ assets, debts and their estimates of their values.  While the Rule protects certain information such as requiring the redaction of account numbers and pin codes, the existence of asset and debts will still be listed online unless the parties’ attorneys take steps to protect this information from the Internet.  Children’s names, dates of birth and parties’ social security numbers are redacted or hidden, but again, the fact that parties have minor children becomes public knowledge as the pleadings will identify the fact that certain parties are addressing custody, visitation and child support.

Parties’ jobs and places of employment are also not specifically protected by the new rule.  The new rule, though, does state that

“[p]arties preparing or filing documents are prohibited from filing documents which contain personal identifying information delineated in S.C. Code Ann. § 30-2-330(A). Parties should exercise caution and refrain from including any unnecessary personal identifying information in court filings so as to limit the necessity of redacting documents. Furthermore, parties should exercise caution in including other sensitive personal data in filings, such as medical records, employment history, individual financial information, proprietary or trade secret information, information regarding an individual’s cooperation with the government, information regarding the victim of any criminal activity, or national security information.”

Thus, Rule 41.2(b),  SCRCP , does allow attorneys to redacted certain information and in fact, the rule goes on to state that attorneys may not only redact but they can put personal data identifiers in a confidential file that the Clerk is not to make available to the public. This portion of the rule states,

“(b) Reference Lists.  Where personal data identifiers are relevant to an issue in the case, a filing that contains redacted information may be filed together with a confidential reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed. The list must be filed as a confidential document, which is not available to the public, and may be amended as of right. The confidential reference list shall not be made available on the Case Management System Public Index and may only be viewed by the parties and the court and staff. Any reference in the case to a listed identifier will be construed to refer to the corresponding item of information. No order of the court is required to file a reference list.

While the new rule is sensitive to the fact that electronic filing can reveal private information in an online format, our Supreme Court has taken measures to attempt to provide protection. This protection, however, is very limited. Thus, parties’ attorneys must take the extra precautions of protecting their clients’ proprietary data so others do not steal and misuse this material for their own gain.  The important lesson for litigants and lawyers alike it to carefully craft all documents that are electronically filed so clients, clients’ children and the entire family are not harmed by this new system, but instead, benefit from the cost savings and ease of use the system provides.

Several years ago, this issue came up with Justice Toal first raised concerns about the Sunshine laws.  To protect family law litigants, the Supreme Court drafted Rule 41.1 so family court litigants could seal their files where their right to privacy outweighed the public’s right to review certain court documents.  At the time, I chaired SC Family Court section, and as part of this discussion and major overhaul of Common Pleas litigation where settlement agreements sometimes kept the public unaware of harmful defects in product designs, I wrote a law review article to distinguish those situations from family court litigation.   See   Family Court Files:  A Treasure Trove for Identity Thieves .

Thus, today’s most significant change to our Rules of Civil Procedure is the addition of  Rule 41.2.  The rule only addresses future filings and does not address how to protect previously filed cases or whether those cases will be scanned in and put online.  This is an issue that has yet to be addressed, and one that family court lawyers need to stay abreast of.

However, it is fairly clear from today’s announcement that electronic filing in family court cases is about to be launched in South Carolina.  I applaud this move forward with technology, but I also caution every SC family court attorney to carefully consider what information you put into your pleadings, motions, financial declarations, agreements, affidavits and orders and make sure you redact any information that would harm your client if it was released and made public to the world online.

Share by: